This is a great month for writers. Out this
month: two marvelous books, from two of the
country’s most eminent writing coaches, Jack Hart
and Roy Peter Clark.
I mentioned Mr. Hart’s book,
A Writer’s
Coach, in the last column. It deserves more
than a mention. Mr. Hart has coached writers for
years at
The Oregonian newspaper, and for
part of that time he produced a newsletter called
Second Takes for the paper’s staff and
freeloaders like me who were lucky enough to get
on the mailing list. It was the best newsletter
on writing I’ve ever seen. I only wish I had the
full collection of issues.
Mr. Hart has taken much of the best advice from
Second Takes and put it into
A Writer’s
Coach. You will find wisdom on every page.
Here’s a sample:
Snake Rule No. 1: Direct
quotations must appear as separate paragraphs.
Where’d this one come from? True, we create a
separate paragraph for the words of each speaker
in a dialogue. But what does that have to do with
direct quotes?
For the record, no rule dictates that you set off
each direct quotation as a separate paragraph. Do
so if you want, for emphasis. But if the quote
flows naturally from the preceding introductory
material, you’d be well advised to leave it in
the same paragraph, like this:
Brady leaned into the bar, cranked his head to
the right, and spied the bartender twelve stools
down. “Bring me a beer and shot,” he
bellowed. “I’m not a patient
man.”
Hallelujah!
As Mr. Hart says, no rule—none—requires a
separate graf for each quote. But most of the
newspaper writers and editors I know act as if
such a rule existed. Some editors reflexively
swing their trusty little copy hatchets and split
a dandy paragraph just to get the quote
out.
Roy Peter Clark is vice president and senior
scholar at the Poynter Institute in Florida. He
published a series of columns, “Fifty Writing
Tools,” on Poynter’s Web site, then gathered them
into his book. It is
Writing Tools: 50
Essential Strategies for Every Writer.
Even if you read the columns on the Web site
(they are no longer there) and downloaded them,
you will want to get the book.
Mr. Clark makes learning not only painless for
the reader but also fun. His book is aptly
titled: He gives writers tools to use and play
with, not stuffy rules to confine them.
Here’s a paragraph I like:
To understand the difference
between a good adverb and a bad adverb, consider
these two sentences: “She smiled happily"
and “She
smiled sadly.” Which one works best? The first
seems weak because “smiled” contains the meaning
of “happily.” On the other hand, “sadly” changes
the meaning.
These books are for writers of every sort, not
just journalists.
Every writer I know could profit from them.